The Review Crew: “The First Wario Land Wii Poop”
Full Metal Kiwi and company review a Wario Land Poop. Together. As a family.
Hello good folks! Welcome to the first round table review of The Review Crew: A group of specially selected forum members who review carefully selected poops. Take these opinions as just that: opinions. We do not claim to know the true meaning of “poop,” nor do we claim to know the best.
The group was created by Christoph, an editor for the News Page. The Review Crew is led by Full Metal Kiwi (FMK) and is consisted of RealGenericFilms (RGF), TheDarkRises (TDR), ShadowWario (Swari), Synister Sir (Syn), and thewafflemaster (TWM). Now, on with the review!
“The First Wario Land Wii Poop” by eiremoonblossom, aka Kamek TV.
It uses footage of the new Wario game for Wii, as well as footage from Super Smash Bros. Brawl. There’s also various sound sources as well.
FMK: I’d like to start this review off by asking what people thought of the techniques used for pooping.
Syn: First of all, I have to mention that this poop was waaaaay too long for my taste. Even though a lot of it was pooped, I still felt that it was kind of empty. I was left wanting more from it.
Swari: I agree with Synister, it was pretty long and was kinda boring. I really don’t like poops over a minute and a half unless they’re REALLY epic. Also, some of the edits were kinda expected and it didn’t feel edited enough.
TDR: As the others said, it felt pretty lengthy and pretty slow. It seems like something you can make in an hour with little or no effort.
Swari: Also the title, description, and tags were all generic and don’t add to the humor at all.
Syn: It wasn’t a generic WMM poop and actually used something other than that. But it used one of the most overused things in WMM, slow down + pixelate, which is something I hate.
FMK: I felt there was a strange uniqueness to it. The edits and techniques used were few and far between, as if the creator wanted to preserve the content as much as possible. Heck, if you brought the volume down, you’d probably forget you were watching a poop. However, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t find Wario “WAH”ing at Luigi’s trophy hilarious on its own.
RGF: Much too slow for me. FMK’s thought is valid, though this is more a remix than a poop. The first edit does not even start for 20 sec
onds! This poop also is a bit low on rape, even for WMM.
FMK: Yeah, I’d call it more of a “Wario Land+Brawl remix” than a poop… Although, if it were shorter, we’d probably see the same problems with it. I noticed many people have problems with pacing, and this one is no exception. It feels long, like the scene with Wario waiting to go through the telescope (or whatever), I felt like it didn’t deliver in the end. Am I making sense?
Swari: PERFECT SENSE.
RGF: In addition to being a remix more than a poop, it’s few edits do not fit together well. E.g., when Wario repeats some actions it is lazily spliced instead of looking seamless… well, you know what I mean. I think we can all agree that this is a remix and still not a good one.
TWM: What really disappointed me about this poop is how the original material was kinda spoiled [with] references like “Arrowed!” and the Cd-i/SMW quotes. Though his sources had no understandable English dialogue, I do give him a bit of leeway. [Also,] when someone claims their poop is the first in the title, I view it as being self-centered most of the time. It was actually pretty mediocre in my mind.
TDR: In my opinion, it was pretty lazily done. A lot of the bits were just long fillers like the laughing seal and the unedited scenes. Like wafflemaster said, it was pretty mediocre.
FMK: I don’t think it’s really all that bad…. it’s just very slow. If the cuts came quicker and less of the original content was preserved, it probably would be exceptional… perhaps.
Swari: It would be exceptional but rather bland. And that blandness is increased by its slowness.
Syn: I felt it had a slow delivery and didn’t deliver that much in the end. It was really boring and bland.
Swari: It may be the first Wario Wii poop, but it is slow and somewhat predictable.
RGF: Also, its edits are shoddily spliced and this is not worth a view.
TDR: It is too lengthy and goes at a very slow pace, making it unbearable to watch.
FMK: This poop could have been at least worth watching if more effort was put in, too much content is unedited that it’s really hard to keep interested.
Well there you have it, folks. This is the first of our reviews, and there will be more coming! Thank you for reading.







July 27th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
Excellent job, and a good review.
Probably what would go through my mind while watching a poop.
Hopefully, you guys will find a much more suitable and enjoyable poop to review next time.
Cheers.
July 27th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Good.
July 27th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
I know I could do ALOT better then that, and it was rushed because I wanted to use the footage before someone else did. I didn’t know anyone would bother writing a review for this crapfest. I’m not mad though, and I hope you guys enjoy the much superior poops out there.
July 27th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Good formatting on the review.
July 27th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
I like the idea of having poop reviews on the site.
Maybe we could find a poop to review that’s a little more debatable though
This one was pretty obviously poor.
July 28th, 2008 at 10:06 am
Yay.
July 29th, 2008 at 6:50 pm
That was cool, would love to read more of these
August 1st, 2008 at 2:59 am
Everybody hates slow poops now?
Crazy kids and their 1 minute ass rapes.
LOL, I pretty much agree with rule that unless the long poop is good.
August 1st, 2008 at 9:36 am
A lot of people prefer the faster pace because slower poops don’t have as much editing and thus don’t show as much effort or effects put into it.
Personally, I like slower poops as long as they’re done well. I could watch a six or ten minute poop if it held my attention and was a bit slow at times. But then again, others just can’t stand watching things over two minutes, even if the poop is good.
We all have our tastes, and hopefully by using this type of review, we can communicate our tastes to others who may have different opinions.
August 1st, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Interesting, but one thing bothers me
Too many motherfuckers who poop have ADD
I have no problem when someone makes poops that are lengthy & shit like that, but it just bothers me that the reviewers (The majority) seem to think “Short poops should be mandatory” should be the way
As some might know (Or not), I tried out for the review crew & was rejected, due to an hastily & half-assed done review for the poop used for the assignment to get initiated for the crew (Also, I didn’t like the main source used for the poop used for the example), though I doubt I would have been acceptable anyways
Now I did watch it & it was so-so, but what i’m more pissed-off about is that biased-hatred towards poops that aren’t brief, mindless noise porn (Which is usually referred to as Ear Rape, though you can do the cheap way of Eap Rape & just use a Controlled Bleeding noise song). Now I had made some lengthy poops (The longest being at nearly six minutes, though that one sucks ass), but my average length for my typical poops is at least 3:00 & at least 1/2 minutes for a Poop Tennis serve & I hope folks don’t discriminate me for making poops that some consider to be “Long”
Now i’m done ranting & i’ll be sure to check in to see what poops you review next
August 2nd, 2008 at 2:19 am
I’m not saying anything bad about anyone except myself, but again, I know I could do A HELL OF ALOT better then that, and it was bloody rushed because I wanted to use the footage before someone else did. I didn’t know you guys would write a review for this crapfest. I’m not mad though. Oh, I deleted it so everyone is happy. Never again will I attempt to use Wario Land footage again!
August 4th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Gee wiz…my comment was super-harsh
Sorry for that, folks
Anyway, looking forward to the next set of reviews